Discussion about this post

User's avatar
fport's avatar

And still no one asks if they should, I’ve got a trillion citizens living downstairs in my gut biome that have no idea after having survived a somewhat over pedigreed virus with all the human keys and the ability to penetrate deep into previously unmined nooks and crannies.

Celeste Garcia's avatar

Once again, MRCOMPUTERSCIENCE, you have my brain going in many different directions. I love these thoughtful summaries that help me keep up with big AI news.

The Stanford breakthrough shows AI’s potential to tackle persistent medical challenges like antibiotic resistance. I’m no bio scientist but designing synthetic phage genomes from scratch is impressive. This is one of the latest examples of how AI will advance medicine and drug treatments in ways we never thought possible.

Regarding the Suno and Udio SCANDAL. It harkens back to the fledgling days of digital music downloads and Napster. And back then as now, it took the big guys, UMG, Warner, and Sony to step in. This time we might need Taylor Swift.

Your likely right that respecting copyright and compensating artists may ultimately favor Big Tech, simply because they’re the ones who can afford to do it at scale. But there is a data licensing startup called Human Native where creators can opt in, set terms, and get paid. So a small startup is proving it’s possible to respect copyright in training data.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?